Eline Borch Petersen
Senior Scientist, Denmark

Effective communication is more than recognizing words—it involves turn-taking, engagement, and having a good conversational flow.
Traditional hearing-aid evaluations focus on speech intelligibility, but real-world conversations require precise timing, vocal effort, and cognitive processing to ensure a smooth interaction with your conversation partner(s).
Hearing impairment disrupts communications by making it harder to anticipate turn endings, adjust speech levels, and cause people to engage different conversation strategies, particularly in noisy environments or group conversations.
As a result, conversations may become more effortful, less fluid, and more dominated by certain speakers when one or more suffers from impaired hearing.
To improve communication support, we need to assess how hearing impairment and hearing aids influence conversational dynamics, beyond speech intelligibility and word recognition, and ensure that hearing aids support natural interaction.
We conducted multiple studies analyzing how hearing impairment, noise, and hearing-aid use shape real-world conversations. Our research included:
By integrating natural conversations into a controlled experimental design, we examined speech levels, turn-taking timing, speaking time distribution, and perceived communication success to understand how individuals adapt their communication strategies to different challenges.
Unaided HI individuals take longer to initiate turns and show more variability in timing, suggesting difficulty in predicting when to speak.
Normal-hearing (NH) partners compensate for the impaired hearing experienced by the conversation partner by raising their voice, even more so than the HI talkers themselves.
Hearing aid use normalized speech levels and improves turn-taking precision, making conversational exchanges smoother and improving the conversational flow.
However, background noise increases cognitive effort for all speakers, leading to longer response times, louder speech, and reduced conversational flow.
Our findings reinforce that conversations are affected not only be speech clarity (speech level), but also on how people respond, emphasizing the need for hearing-aid evaluations that incorporate conversational dynamics as key measures.
Future research should focus on:
Moving beyond speech intelligibility tests to conversation-based assessments allows us to better understand and support real-world communication challenges.
By focusing on how people interact, not just how they hear, we move toward hearing solutions that truly support effortless and meaningful communication.